01.09.2024 - 10:46
However, the most ridiculous thing about this season is that Paradox won third place without even having participated in the competitive CW, all the effort made by Lev, Kogi, the other boys and I was in vain, very disappointing.
Töltés...
Töltés...
|
|||
Töltés...
Töltés...
|
|||
01.09.2024 - 12:59
Trophies arent even handed out, runaways ( my clan) won first place and never got a trophy, and we've probably never gotten other trophies we deserve lol so i stopped keeping track
---- hi
Töltés...
Töltés...
|
|||
01.09.2024 - 13:09
Not even the trophy is important, what matters is that an inactive clan wins over the second most active clan of the entire season
Töltés...
Töltés...
|
|||
01.09.2024 - 13:33
this season we will give out trophies same with the next one and so on.
---- Life has no limitations, except the ones you make. --Les Brown
Töltés...
Töltés...
|
|||
01.09.2024 - 13:51
I'm sorry to see that domi. On 8/30, when you were only 5 points ahead of Paradox, maybe you should have stopped playing just to ensure you got one
Töltés...
Töltés...
|
|||
01.09.2024 - 14:28
Just to remind you that active clans get huge boost for activity of +1 elo for every cw they play, both for loss and win (WD's suggestion implemented few years back). With 74 additional elo, you should have won 3rd place isntead of paradox easily.
Töltés...
Töltés...
|
|||
01.09.2024 - 15:20
However, my friend Sasha told me this morning that if we had at least won one more battle we would have the trophy while Paradox won the prize with only one victory in the entire season lol
Töltés...
Töltés...
|
|||
01.09.2024 - 15:37
It is your mistake for almost having negative elo and pretending to win a trophy too, right
Töltés...
Töltés...
|
|||
01.09.2024 - 16:16
Looking at the season, I kind of have to agree. The algorithm for determining who wins a CW season should probably be reviewed. Unless Paradox played the ultimate game ever, I don't think that they deserved a higher ranking than a clan with a 47:33 win rating. It's not great, but also not bad enough for this to seem warranted. This isn't an ideas and suggestions post, but I would imagine that creating an algorithm for this might be needed. It would look at the 10 clans with the most games(or perhaps the x% of clans with the most games), and reduce somewhat significantly the score of clans who do very well, but played a fraction of the 10 clans' games, and increasingly lower penalties as clans get closer to those scores. Alternatively, maybe just put in a heavy penalty for playing under 5 games, a moderate one if you play under 10, and a very light one if you play under 25. Perhaps these penalties could only be in place to affect the leaderboard, or perhaps the top 10/20 clans. Penalized clans that get kicked below the threshold, but were originally above it(or were penalized due to being brought into the threshold when the previous clan was penalized) would be given ranks based on who did better before the penalties, and the remaining clans would just get their ranks below them.
Töltés...
Töltés...
|
|||
01.09.2024 - 20:08
They had a positive W/r, sit down lil boy before i have to humble u
---- hi
Töltés...
Töltés...
|
|||
02.09.2024 - 04:24
Duel?
Töltés...
Töltés...
|
|||
02.09.2024 - 06:18
It's kinda sad we lost 3rd place but tbh doesn't matter since we kept throwing cws badly. That 120+ elo loss was a total knockout, It could make a def if we just lost half of em Ps: We had to get gud ig
Töltés...
Töltés...
|
|||
Töltés...
Töltés...
|
|||
02.09.2024 - 08:10
Töltés...
Töltés...
|
|||
02.09.2024 - 11:56
How did you guys even manage to do that, it looks like SP Police's clan war history
Töltés...
Töltés...
|
|||
Töltés...
Töltés...
|
Copyright © 2024 atWar. All rights reserved.
Biztos vagy benne?