Ouch Posztolt üzenetek: 72 Től:: USA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1522f/1522f2e8d1732686098d5a117470b144487b16ba" alt="" |
It is a good idea to the fact that submarines dont have a great capacity currently anyways...
----
-Man on a Mission
AkA berserk
Töltés...
Töltés...
|
Homero Posztolt üzenetek: 78 Től:: Lengyelország
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0ce7/b0ce73f7166e9c92ba6caeb62cd4d8b085cf0710" alt="" |
I would leave subs capacity where it is. They can transport 4 with MoS which I feel it's all right already.
Töltés...
Töltés...
|
Homero Posztolt üzenetek: 78 Től:: Lengyelország
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0ce7/b0ce73f7166e9c92ba6caeb62cd4d8b085cf0710" alt="" |
Well maybe because AT primary role is to transport. Subs main role is surprise attack (in theory). Transport option is somehow a bonus like for helicopters in DS, and I know that in practice subs are just stealth transports rarely used for attacks but that doesn't mean they should be underwater transport for 4-5 units with 7 or 9 attack and stealth. If we go with capacity II why not make them benefit from Safer Transportation's +3 HP?
Töltés...
Töltés...
|
|
Its ok how it is 5 is just no needed
Töltés...
Töltés...
|